This website is written by experts in Pharmaceutical Industry Manufacturing Research and Development and Regulatory Affairs Since 2008 and in 2011 Awarded as one of top 10 websites across world in Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Regulatory
USFDA WHO GMP Guidelines Pharmaceutical Regulations Information about Pharma Quality Managment System Validations Process Validation Cleaning Validation Equipment Qualification Equipment Process Validation Computer System Validation Sterile Product Manufacturing Guidelines Media fill guideline Aseptic Techniques in Sterile dosage form Clean Room Clean Room Classification Guidelines on Area Qualification HVAC AHU HEPA Filter HEPA Filter integrity testing and leak test

Saturday, February 13, 2010

Clean Rooms in Aseptic Process Aspects of Air filtration HEPA filters and ULFA filters Efficiency tests Integrity Test

The efficiency test For HEPA  filters uses a monodispersed aerosol of 0.3 micron sized particles and assesses filter media. Downstream readings represent an average over the entire filter surface. Efficiency tests are not intended to test for filter leaks.

A single probe reading equivalent to 0.01 percent of the upstream challenge would be considered as indicative of a significant leak and calls for replacement of the HEPA filter or, when appropriate, repair in a limited area. A subsequent confirmatory retest should be performed in the area of any repair.

Article starts here ..........

 Air Filtration In  Aseptic process
1.Membrane

A compressed gas should be of appropriate purity (e.g., free from oil) and its microbiological and particle quality after filtration should be equal to or better than that of the air in the environment into which the gas is introduced. Compressed gases such as air, nitrogen, and carbon dioxide are often used in cleanrooms and are frequently employed in purging or overlaying.

Membrane filters can be used to filter a compressed gas to meet an appropriate high-quality standard. These filters are often used to produce a sterile compressed gas to conduct operations involving sterile materials, such as components and equipment. For example, we recommend that sterile membrane filters be used for autoclave air lines, lyophilizer vacuum breaks, and tanks containing sterilized materials. Sterilized holding tanks and any contained liquids should be held under positive pressure or appropriately sealed to prevent microbial contamination. Safeguards should be in place to prevent a pressure change that can result in contamination due to back flow of nonsterile air or liquid.

Gas filters (including vent filters) should be dry. Condensate on a gas filter can cause blockage during use or allow for the growth of microorganisms. Use of hydrophobic filters, as well as application of heat to these filters where appropriate, prevents problematic moisture residues. We recommend that filters that serve as sterile boundaries or supply sterile gases that can affect product be integrity tested upon installation and periodically thereafter (e.g., end of use). Integrity tests are also recommended after activities that may damage the filter. Integrity test failures should be investigated, and filters should be replaced at appropriate, defined intervals.

2. High-Efficiency Particulate Air Filter (HEPA)  The same broad principles can be applied to ULPA filters.

 HEPA filter integrity should be maintained to ensure aseptic conditions. Leak testing should be performed at installation to detect integrity breaches around the sealing gaskets, through the frames, or through various points on the filter media. Thereafter, leak tests should be performed at suitable time intervals for HEPA filters in the aseptic processing facility. For example, such testing should be performed twice a year for the aseptic processing room. Additional testing may be appropriate when air quality is found to be unacceptable, facility renovations might be the cause of disturbances to ceiling or wall structures, or as part of an investigation into a media fill or drug product sterility failure. Among the filters that should be leak tested are those installed in dry heat depyrogenation tunnels and ovens commonly used to depyrogenate glass vials. Where justified, alternate methods can be used to test HEPA filters in the hot zones of these tunnels and ovens.

Any aerosol used for challenging a HEPA filter should meet specifications for critical physicochemical attributes such as viscosity. Dioctylphthalate (DOP) and poly-alpha-olefin (PAO) are examples of appropriate leak testing aerosols. Some aerosols are problematic because they pose the risk of microbial contamination of the environment being tested. Accordingly, the evaluation of any alternative aerosol involves ensuring it does not promote microbial growth.

There is a major difference between filter leak testing and efficiency testing. An efficiency test is a general test used to determine the rating of the filter


An intact HEPA filter should be capable of retaining at least 99.97 percent of particulates greater than 0.3 µm in diameter. The purpose of performing regularly scheduled leak tests, on the other hand, is to detect leaks from the filter media, filter frame, or seal. The challenge involves use of a polydispersed aerosol usually composed of particles with a light-scattering mean droplet diameter in the submicron size range,(Although the mean is normally less than one micron, it is greater than 0.3µm.) including a sufficient number of particles at approximately 0.3 µm. Performing a leak test without introducing a sufficient upstream challenge of particles of known size upstream of the filter is ineffective for detecting leaks. It is important to introduce an aerosol upstream of the filter in a concentration that is appropriate for the accuracy of the aerosol photometer. The leak test should be done in place, and the filter face scanned on the downstream side with an appropriate photometer probe, at a sampling rate of at least one cubic foot per minute. The downstream leakage measured by the probe should then be calculated as a percent of the upstream challenge. An appropriate scan should be conducted on the entire filter face and frame, at a position about one to two inches from the face of the filter. This comprehensive scanning of HEPA filters should be fully documented.

A single probe reading equivalent to 0.01 percent of the upstream challenge would be considered as indicative of a significant leak and calls for replacement of the HEPA filter or, when appropriate, repair in a limited area. A subsequent confirmatory retest should be performed in the area of any repair.

HEPA filter leak testing alone is insufficient to monitor filter performance. It is important to conduct periodic monitoring of filter attributes such as uniformity of velocity across the filter (and relative to adjacent filters). Variations in velocity can cause turbulence that increases the possibility of contamination. Velocities of unidirectional air should be measured 6 inches from the filter face and at a defined distance proximal to the work surface for HEPA filters in the critical area. Velocity monitoring at suitable intervals can provide useful data on the critical area in which aseptic processing is performed. The measurements should correlate to the velocity range established at the time of in situ air pattern analysis studies. HEPA filters should be replaced when nonuniformity of air velocity across an area of the filter is detected or airflow patterns may be adversely affected.

We will be writing about Designig of Aseptic process clean rooms for sterile pharmaceutical dosage forms, in next article ,
So stay in touch with our blog .
Over this website you will get complete knowledge about all pharmaceutical manufacturing process and research and development , Pharmaceutical  good manufacturing practices in pharma  gmp guidelines  ,Quality assurance, pharmaceutical quality assurance , Pharmaceutical Regulatory Affairs , Sterile Dosage Form and Aseptic process , Aseptic Techniques , Aseptic Manupulations  used in Sterile Dosage Form, Injectable Dosage form manufacturing FDA guidelines

21 CFR part 11

We encourage you to Signe up to this website and receive our articles by email strait way in to your INBOX as and when we write a new article over this website.

This website is most favorite Amongst professionals almost all pharmaceutical companies in USA , Pharmaceutical companies in UK , Pharmaceutical companies in Japan , Canada , UAE , Pharma compay in India .This website is pharmaceuticals manufacturers guide

1 comment:

James said...

What should be the room classification (as per cGMP)in the filling of Nasal Spray?

Pharma Guidelines Most Read

.

Readers Visit Number

This website is Authentic Source of Pharmaceutical Guidelines

This website is Authentic Source of Pharmaceutical Guidelines

Pharma Validations Quality Management System USFDA Guidelines WHO GMP Guidelines New Drug Update





This website consist of detail Information about Pharma Guidelines Pharma Regulatory Affairs USFDA Guidelines WHO Guidelines Pharmaceutical Quality Management System Pharma Validations Process Validation Cleaning Validation Equipment Qualification Equipment Process Validation Computer System Validation Sterile Product Manufacturing Guidelines Media fill guideline Aseptic Techniques in Sterile dosage form Clean Room Clean Room Classification Guidelines on Area Qualification HVAC AHU HEPA Filter HEPA Filter integrity testing and leak test